I strongly oppose the downstairs point of view, traditional vegetable market should not be replaced so quickly, the practice of various e-commerce giants belong to the forced oppression of small vegetable farmers and ordinary vendors of living space, may violate the ? anti-trust law? In addition, Pinduoduo, the United States they have not officially withdrawn from the community group purchasing, just a part of the supplier suspended the supply of the association group purchasing.

a, Internet giants strong into the vegetable market, which is simply ? rogue style? Ground grabbing

Internet giants like Alibaba, Meituan, Pinduoduo, Suning, DDT, they have strong capital, massive big data, extremely advanced algorithms, it is reasonable to say that a little bit of turnip and cabbage can't even get into their eyes.

But they see? Grocery shopping? This is an important part of daily life, and they want to use grocery shopping as a way to capture a bundle of users for greater growth. So, they put their foot down and took the initiative to spend money with the vegetable market vendors to get up? the same stage?

This weight class is obviously not the same as the fight, the vendors have no chance of winning. If you sell potatoes for 2.5 yuan/catty, then the community group buying money to sell 0.5 yuan/catty, the same goods, hard out of the low 5 times the price, to you you buy which? As long as it is a normal person, surely will choose 0.5 yuan / pound of potatoes.

Industry giants like Alibaba, the United States, Pinduoduo, they are completely time-consuming months with you to fight the price war, they do not need to pay what price; and small traders a few months of sustained losses, they can not afford to pay rent, manpower wastage, the goods backlog deterioration, it is the same as asking for the old life.

Therefore, the connected giants grabbed the land with the small vegetable farmers, completely a rogue's victory.

Two, the Internet giants monopolize the vegetable market, really can always be preferential to the end? Don't dream about it!

Many people see the Internet giants stage victory, may issue a sigh of relief: this is the power of science and technology, this is the new things for the impact of the old things, it simplifies the process, reduces the price, improves the quality of service, will inevitably subvert the traditional vegetable market.

Come on, think about the Internet giants into the field of fresh food e-commerce, really to engage in charity? They are going out of their way to steal business with small vegetable vendors, clearly? Businessmen seek profit, profit is the word?

After the Internet giants completely dominate the fresh food market, they will no longer sell food at a loss,certainly wield the scythe and double the money they subsidized before. After all, after the disappearance of small traders, they are the only hegemony, how to set the price, it is not their say? If you don't want to buy it, then it's not for sale anywhere else, so you'll just have to pay for it.

This is not a wild guess on my part, but there are all sorts of actual theories and cases to refer to.

Think of the precision analysis of big data, which, after learning your details, can not only accurately serve you, but also accurately serve you? , which has been a common occurrence in our lives.

We traveled to the network car, hotel, our home order takeout, at first they are not also a variety of subsidies, new user point more than 20 yuan of takeout, the first single only 0.01 yuan, basically the same as the white delivery. We thought it was a good deal, and the times have changed so much that it's simply cheap, convenient and comfortable.

But then look at the market as it matures, The price of takeout is still returning to what it should be, with box charges and delivery fees still rising, health issues surfacing, and hidden behaviors of killers gradually being revealed.

Try to ask, who can to such a? subversion? Maintain 100% trust and support?

Third, the behavior of the e-commerce giants, suspected of touching the ? antitrust laws? selling goods at unfairly high prices or buying goods at unfairly low prices; (ii) selling goods at prices below cost without justifiable reasons.

Businessmen making money can be cruel and icy,but the law is not cold; it is a warm weapon to protect the weak. It restrains the behavior of industry giants to a certain extent and gives everyone a relatively fair environment.

Besides the law, there are also 2 suppliers, Huahai Shunda and Weilong (the one that produces chili fries) Trading Company, which have publicly announced that they are cutting off supplies to community group purchases to show their opposition to community group purchasing platforms.

If the major Internet giants continue to burn money to subsidize and disrupt the market order, more suppliers will announce their cut-offs, and new opposition initiatives will follow.

Finally:

The community group-buying platform was originally a good thing, it can facilitate the public's daily grocery shopping, but after it took over, everything changed. I hope that those Internet giants to engage in more future technological innovation, do not come to the disaster of small and medium-sized vendors' rice bowls.