(1) the principle of effective reasoning. Known data can be introduced by how much unknown depends on two points: one is whether the data can be Hua: two is how to use these data, the principle of effective reasoning of the specific rest of the rules and methods are as follows:
① fidelity. That is, correct and effective reasoning to ensure that from the true premise of the true conclusion
② Necessity. That is, there is a necessary connection between the premise and conclusion of the reasoning
③Relevant, that is, the premise and conclusion of the reasoning must have meaning and content of the correlation between the premises
④Universal. That is, data processing methods must be general and universal
⑤ Simple. That is, data processing must be easily understood and grasped.
(2) The principle of the judge's subject. The finality of the judicial decision requires to follow the principle of the judge's subject, the specific rules and methods are as follows:
①Data processing in the data is the state of the past, each step from the known to predict the unknown ultimately must be decided and completed by the judge.
② data processing in the data may be incomplete, the judge's thinking should be comprehensive.
3 data-based reasoning is valid need to be judged by the judge, the nature of the conclusion of the reasoning should be evaluated by the judge.
④ In difficult and novel cases, the judge must reason dialectically based on the knowledge of morality, justice and the laws of social development, and with the help of these concepts of justice acquired through personal conscience, substantive fairness and justice can be realized.
(3) the principle of judicial argumentation. In the process of legal application, the judicial debate seems to be the final test court, rational thinking requires "trial-centered".
(4) always big data, cloud computing, information technology, artificial intelligence as an auxiliary means of realizing legal justice, not blindly rely on technology and forget to use the wisdom of the judges.
Judicial data processing, especially the analysis of key data research and judgment of the quality of the judge has put forward higher requirements. Only a higher quality of the judge can take the modern information technology as an important auxiliary means, make full use of cloud computing, big data, the Internet, artificial intelligence to provide objective information, algorithms and quantitative analysis, to enhance the certainty and credibility of justice, but not fall into the "data fetishism".