Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - Debating the argument that the benefits of scholarly stardom outweigh the drawbacks
Debating the argument that the benefits of scholarly stardom outweigh the drawbacks
When it comes to "scholar stars", we can't avoid CCTV's "The Hundred Schools of Lecture", as a "dream factory" for creating scholar stars, this program has become popular, and TV stations around the world have followed suit. "Scholar star" phenomenon then gradually become a trend or trend.  People, in order to become a star, need to have three major elements, one is said to "fans" (now usually called fans), two is said to "show", three is said to "hold", one of the three is indispensable. So, you want to argue that the pros outweigh the cons, you must address a few issues Controversy 1: is the teaching, or misguided

Being a professor, Yi Zhongtian's supporters all over the country, known as the "Yi powder," "ether"

This is the first time that I've ever seen a professor who was a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. ...... Yi Zhongtian reads history in a very popular language, and it is this very modern language that has been questioned by academics.

Controversy 2: public service, or personal fame

From Yan Chongnian to Liu Xinwu, "Hundred Lecture Theatre" launched the main speaker basically all fire, and these people years of academic precipitation also went to the market. On the one hand, the packaging of the star, on the other hand, let the star to their own point of view to explain, and widely disseminated to the audience.

Controversy 3: whether it is fair to the buried researchers

Yu Qiuyu, Liu Xinwu, Yi Zhongtian and others have brought them a lot of benefits while increasing their popularity. Is this fame and fortune they have gained fair to those scholars who have buried their heads in books to study their studies?

Controversy 4: Is it to earn money or driven by responsibility

For scholars like stars in the television, print and other media appearances, some readers have a reverse psychology, that their "dissemination of knowledge" process is obviously in the show.

Just as economists often talk about the need for innovation in the product market, scholars with star potential began to get out of the small study and classroom, to the broader "market" to create and obtain new value. They finally realized that the sage Confucius as early as two thousand years ago, with the stubbornness of the Shandong people, hard for the community to train three thousand disciples from all directions, but also for thousands of years of fame. In fact, the ancient study tours or modern when the academic star or, in the final analysis, is to attract as much "attention", so that ideas, knowledge, such a scarce resource can produce the greatest benefits. As long as consumers can get a greater utility with a smaller payment, why not?