An absurd tour of the world in the name of murder for insurance, a sense of the true meaning of life from the absurdists, and a search for the happily ever after of life. There is some lack of character creation in the early part of the movie, and the plot proceeds to be overly raw, but as the storyline progresses, the characters slowly round into shape, and Liu Yan changes her sexy and charming design style to give a superb performance to bring us all into this little story of insurance fraud. On the whole, this film is a no-brainer and well worth tuning in to the movie theater for.
I. PlotThe film begins to set a character dilemma, as a net cafe management Wu Hai has no money, the child suffers from asthma, in order to better the child he is desperate and for the sake of wrongdoing and corruption Zhong Zhenjiang formulated a marriage fraud kills people to cheat the insurance program. And the sexy and exposed network anchor River, in fact, is a woman who must bear the burden of daily life, care for her elderly father. A love story that gradually builds up to a better killing, it ends up giving a more family reunion, with two people meeting again, leaving open the possibility that they will continue to come to FAW. Taken from real events, the fact that the wife is far from the movie's good fortune, she is indeed not easy to swim, the only fortunate about is not really dead, for the fault to obtain forgiveness, the two people again came to the plot, but also not.
At the time, each of the defense put a cost on this miserable insurance fraud. A film that deals with the offense was originally the best is the theme, unfortunately the result fell into the clichéd love short story. It would have been more meaningful if the movie had ended on an unfortunate note, as opposed to the moralistic outcome of a family reunion. The word "death" surrounds the entire text, a seemingly romantic feelings, but behind it lies a strong intention to kill. Dong Chengpeng's character, the experience is a daily life is destroyed, helpless, and lowly people, film director this allocation seems to be in order to better highlight the destruction of the little man, and its human nature in the middle of the good and evil process of uncertainty.
Two, black ridiculeoriginally a very good distribution, unfortunately, the situation is not set up enough sad Cang, just to better a set of first-line sea-view room, the impulse to evolve the murder, people feel that there are some unscientific. However, if the setting is changed to a child with a serious illness, it falls back to the cliché, similar to many movies. This makes the movie less graphic, and makes it harder for the audience to really feel the anxiety. Perhaps this movie has a lot of problems, its storyline is not sound, the logic is not strict, but overall, or the feeling is very good. Our funny movie, in recent years, tends to be one, as if it is not the use of excessive pomposity to highlight the laughs, or black ridicule in a crazy.
This movie is actually the most eye-catching, that is, Liu Yan, a big vase of sex appeal as a symbol of her, as if in this movie really show the performance. She played a good-looking, seductive anchorwoman in this one, and the live-streaming situation was a hit, and the praise of the gold master's father for not being stingy, all of which made people see the image of a hard-wired celebrity brand. But in private, that kind of poor acid, more sensitive, not confident, home-loving brand image, people feel that this character has life.
Three, similar to compare and contrast"Beneficiary" and "crazy stone" as in the city of chongqing shooting, chongqing dialect composition narrative situation. The same continued, there is also a certain type of "grassroots entrepreneurship" cultural and artistic expression. In both "Beneficiary" and "Crazy Stone", we can see that the originators of the original intention to carry out a real portrait of a certain type of "marginal" people. It is very interesting to note that "Crazy Stone" is derived from "Two Smoking Guns" and "Stealing and Ripping", which are just the successes of their "cultural integration". But how do we define this kind of "local"? The absurdity and serendipity of "Crazy Stone" eliminates the contradiction between an imported narrative architectural scheme and a certain type of imaginative characterization, while "The Benefactor" is a naked marketing campaign of big data, which in the end reveals a kind of misrepresentation and deep depiction of an unawareness of "heterocultural art".
Everyone will always be able to distinguish a person's character according to a fixed and unmoving image, so the first judgment against River is that she is a cheap person who doesn't have to care about her thoughts, and that such a person deserves to be killed even if she is. In fact, people should not use the colored plate myopic glasses to see people, these expose lies and tolerance of behavior, is she against this a hard-won feelings of love and cherish. When I have been drifting in the social development for a long time, but is looking forward to have a family reunion home, so some of the silly that is also understandable. When wipe down the makeup after the River, happened in front of everyone, there is no doubt that the film sprinkled into the actual, 38-year-old Liu Yan happened here, really make us see her not easy.