Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - Officials ordered Tesla to immediately provide driving data, how to protect the right to know?
Officials ordered Tesla to immediately provide driving data, how to protect the right to know?

These days, Tesla because of female owners? The roof of the right event? is completely and utterly a fire, what is the situation, April 19, in the Shanghai auto show site, a woman wearing a printed? Brake failure? A woman wearing a white T-shirt with four big red letters climbed on the roof of a Tesla show car and shouted "Tesla brakes are not working". Tesla brake failure?

What do you think of the official order for Tesla to provide driving data immediately?

Strongly support the Zhengzhou municipal government! Tesla's reluctance to open up the user data it has collected is essentially a matter of data attribution. After all, the current regulation and legislation at the level of big data is far from being able to meet the current state of the market and the industry. Although this situation is gradually getting better, the establishment of the Big Data Bureau is the grip of regulation at the government level for data, a key asset in the future. But it is still far from enough. Just like the previous big data killing and big data lending by Internet companies, what exactly can companies do with the collected user data? To whom does this data belong? At present, there is no clear boundary, from the enterprise level they certainly think that the data they collect belongs to them. But I don't believe this will be the case for long, because in a socialist country, the people's data must belong to the people.

What do you think of the woman who defended her rights on the roof of a Tesla and was placed in administrative detention for five days?

Of course it's thanks to Tesla. If Tesla had promised the owner free repairs and compensation, the owner wouldn't have done this. People who can afford to buy a Tesla are not without a financial base, or don't want to lose face. What was Tesla's response? It refuses to admit that there is something wrong with the car. What is its attitude towards consumers? Arrogant and rude. So is there any problem with the car? Tesla itself has posted the data, is it difficult to admit that there is a problem?

Tesla apologized late at night, what do you think of this wave of operation?

From uncompromising to resolutely cooperate with the investigation, the difference is only one day, I do not see Tesla's apology has a little bit of sincerity, presumably due to the pressure of the regulatory authorities, helpless to concede. And from the content of the apology, the mouth of the cooked duck is still hard. Hegel said: the only lesson mankind has learned from history is that mankind has not learned any lessons from history. The day before Tesla China vice president Tao Lin responded to the auto show rights incident also said: we have no way to compromise, is a new product development must go through a process. Our own research shows that 90% of customers are willing to choose Tesla again. The next day was a slap in the face. Big international brands are never full of arrogance and prejudice when it comes to product disputes involving China, and this is especially true of Tesla. They thought that if they dealt with it coldly, people would forget about it after three days. Except, my lord, times have really changed!