1. Improving and perfecting the evaluation system of titles

Revising the evaluation conditions for each series of titles, establishing multi-dimensional evaluation indexes reflecting ideological integrity, professional ethics, professional competence, technical level, academic influence, innovation effectiveness, decision-making and consulting, talent cultivation, and public ****service, and forming a title evaluation standard that is conducive to the dedication of professional and technical talents to research and innovation. Promote categorized evaluation, and include new occupations such as big data, blockchain, cloud computing, integrated circuits, artificial intelligence, technical brokerage and creative design in the scope of title evaluation. Dynamically adjust professional settings, and support local units to set up new evaluation specialties around strategic development needs, industrial development needs, characteristic industries and key industry chains.

2. Scientific setting of thesis and scientific research results requirements

Establishment of a "menu-type" evaluation index system, thesis from the "mandatory" to the results of the "multi-option Promote the system of representative achievements, standard development, technology promotion, technical solutions, innovation breakthroughs, high-quality patents, achievements transformation, theoretical articles, think-tank results, literary and artistic works, classroom teaching transcripts, lesson plans, medical records, and other performance results can be declared as representative achievements of the job title. Further expanding the scope and form of representative achievements in the evaluation of senior titles.

3. Reduce qualifications, awards and other restrictive conditions

Rationally set the requirements for the recognition of academic qualifications, do not have the required academic qualifications, outstanding performance and contribution, can be recommended by two or more peer experts with senior title to declare; part-time and full-time qualifications, vocational college graduates and graduates of ordinary schools at the same level in the evaluation of titles to enjoy the same treatment; the party school Correspondence education qualifications, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the corresponding qualifications of national education to enjoy the relevant treatment; technical colleges and universities intermediate classes, senior classes, preparatory technician (technician) class graduates, respectively, in accordance with the requirements of secondary school, college, bachelor's degree to declare the existing series of titles. Abolish the practice of simply linking talent titles and awards directly with the evaluation of titles, and do not take scientific research projects, the number of funds, awards, thesis journal levels, titles, titles, etc. as restrictive requirements.

4. Unblocking the channel of title evaluation for all kinds of talents

Broadening the green channel of title evaluation for high-level talents and special talents, and directly declaring the senior titles by "one issue, one person, one policy". Overseas returnees, party and government agencies, exchanges or military rehabilitation to enterprises and institutions engaged in professional and technical work, to enterprises and institutions to work for the first time to declare titles, can refer to similar personnel assessment standards, according to their years of service, academic qualifications and academic performance directly declare the corresponding titles. Explore the implementation of specialization, speciality and new "small giants" enterprises to declare the title of the recommendation system and national defense science and technology and other special areas of talent title assessment of special methods. To carry out a good grass-roots professional and technical talents "directed evaluation, directed use", to encourage the talents to take root in the grass-roots front line to build up a career. Improve the private economic organization personnel special assessment work, for private enterprises to evaluate and reserve more outstanding talents.

5. Give play to the main role of employers

Decentralize the authority of title assessment in an orderly manner, granting the right of title assessment to qualified employers for the record, and supporting national laboratories to carry out independent assessment of senior titles. With the title assessment authority of the unit combined with the objectives and tasks, job responsibilities, performance assessment and other categories to develop title assessment standards; to encourage multiple evaluation methods to identify talent, and promote the combination of evaluation; national key laboratories, national technology innovation centers, science and technology leading enterprises, industry leading enterprises, etc., can recommend the unit's technical personnel to directly assess the corresponding level of titles, to take a more flexible mechanism for the assessment of the title. Strengthen the employing unit to audit the recommended responsibility for the declared personnel's moral character, ability, performance of the authenticity of the situation is responsible for.

6. Advancing the digitization of title evaluation

Building a data base for title evaluation performance files, improving the function of the title system to directly access the study results of public subjects, accelerating the progress of electronic certificates of historical titles, and no longer requesting declarants to provide paper declarations when not necessary, so as to realize the "paperless" title evaluation. Explore the establishment of an online quantitative scoring system, reasonably set the weighting of scores in each evaluation link, and establish a more scientific, precise and fair evaluation mechanism for titles. Implement digital supervision, improve the risk warning function of various types of performance results, and build a database of negative lists of performance carriers, employing units and filers' integrity files. Explore the positive empowerment of title evaluation, take the honesty and trustworthiness of declarant and employer in title evaluation as an important credit rating index for financing application, and encourage and support financial institutions to provide financial credit support for the innovation and entrepreneurship of declarant and employer with good credit.

7. Optimizing management services for title evaluation

Improving the peer evaluation mechanism, establishing professional and self-regulatory title evaluation committees, and carrying out fair and impartial peer evaluations with high representativeness and authority; supporting the evaluation committees in actively exploring ways of recognition by the academic committees and the introduction of third-party agency evaluations, so as to improve the quality and credibility of title evaluation. Standardize the management of evaluation experts, establish a system of recommendation and selection, training and assessment, credit records, withdrawal and disciplinary measures, strengthen the construction of a database of experts for title evaluation, and build a system of evaluation and assessment indicators for evaluation experts. Strengthen the filing of guidance, management, information disclosure, data monitoring and other work, open up complaint and reporting channels, actively accept social supervision, and create a clean and upright environment for title evaluation.