For example, there is a ruling case in which the protagonist is Red Hou Yi and the informant is Red East Emperor Taiyi. At the beginning, the Eastern Emperor allowed Houyi to go online. After Houyi was promoted to 4, he was ready to support the middle road, but it was cut by Ah Yi and then killed by Zhang Liangganke for the second time. Then the team went against the wind and Houyi was killed 0-7 in a row. Therefore, netizens think that Houyi's data is a bit ugly, but there is no problem with pretending to play. On the one hand, it is too miserable, not targeted, on the other hand, it is indeed an auxiliary stocking. It was inevitable that he would be targeted and killed, so Hou Yi was judged to be innocent, but he clashed with other people's opinions. Finally, his ruling was wrong.
The second ruling case is suspected of abuse in the game. Ge Yuan is the thigh of the team in this game, and his record is very good. And a pair of CP players of teammates not only have poor skills, but also don't join the group. So Ge Yuan Lu Bu and Ukyo Tachibana criticized the pair of CP, while Ge Yuan scolded "This pair is really dogs" and was reported by Red Chang 'e in the name of abuse. The netizen thinks that this is actually not an insult, and the couple's game behavior itself is at fault, so it is also judged not to be infringing. As a result, they once again opposed the verdict of others, and finally the system decided that the netizen was wrong.
After several cases were decided, netizens had to vomit that "the eagle eye guards are really too strict now"! Some seemingly small things or slight words may be the reason for being ruled!
For example, even if you are a thigh in the team, teammates can't scold you again, otherwise you will suffer; There are also heroes Cheng and Xin Li, and the team is against the wind. Because there are too few delegations, the data and record are not good, but your economy is high, Tado. After being reported, it is likely to deduct points; For example, on the fifth floor, Zhen Ji plays an auxiliary role, but no gems can be produced. He also followed the shooter to develop the economy, which led to the shooter's failure to develop, which obviously interfered with the normal game behavior, but because the data was not bad, he was found to be illegal ... such similar situations abound.
This netizen is obviously a newcomer who just joined the guard, and his position will not be too high. In the case of 1, Houyi and Yao Xing, combined with the record of 0-7- 1 and the output of 9%, the result is very clear! No matter how targeted it is, it will not be only 9% output. If it is really a dish, it is unforgivable, but it can be obscene.
The second case, Pang Hu, supported this netizen. I can only say that some netizens are still too blx. If "XXX is a real dog", it is very outrageous. Three teammates have opinions about this CP. If you don't even complain, don't say anything. Is this to protect the rights and interests of normal gamers or to protect the rights and interests of abnormal double-row gamers? Pang Hu has reason to suspect that other guards involved in the ruling are also CP players who only care about their own happiness.
The difference in judgments is so great. In fact, to put it bluntly, the standard for joining the Hawkeye Guard is too low, which leads to many ghosts. Many people don't watch the video process and records at all, just take a look at the chat record as a joke and easily give a choice.
For example, there is no clear definition of whether a player "sends his head". Some people are really subjective and negative, some people are "dishes" with poor pure strength, and some people are ignored by teammates and frequently targeted ... Sending people's heads is broadly defined as "under the player's own strength, it is possible to escape and still die as a rhythm initiator many times". Let's take the aforementioned case 1 as an example. If Hou Yi walks into the river or clears the line without protection, it can also be regarded as an act of sending his head off. Because the system can't judge the seriousness and rationality of these behaviors, the player needs to provide the verdict.
This requires players to be realistic, combine the position of the role of the case and the protagonist's consistent gameplay, and change their positions to simulate the situation of the authorities to try to give their own opinions.
Everyone has their own standards for negative game behavior. We can't force everyone to have exactly the same views, but at least we must ensure a serious attitude.
As far as the referee system is concerned, we are just a "tool man" after all. The system can use big data to analyze game behavior, thus improving the accuracy of illegal punishment. So it's normal to have disputes, as long as we decide carefully. I also hope that the official can slightly improve the access standards. "National Hawk" is really a bad thing!