It is impossible to let others fail to answer directly.

A debater is not qualified if he can't answer the questions he can't answer.

When debating freely, the most effective way is to set traps.

Admit the other person's point of view first, and then ask a contradictory question about the other person's point of view.

That is, the child's spear attacks the child's shield.

For example, the other debater said that it is right to put emotion first. Then I want to ask another debater, when his father killed someone, should he choose emotion or reason as his son?

Just an analogy. If you do as I say, you will be deducted. The question should be like this, but there should be no personal questioning. It is necessary to set a trap according to your argument. I can't remember the details at the moment. I'll tell you when I think about it.