The above views are my personal basic judgment and understanding of the future, especially after reading Yuval Huraly's Brief History trilogy, which further strengthened and confirmed these understandings.

In 2013, when I first encountered the term "big data", I had the vague judgment that big data technology was designed to predict the future, and with the integration of big data technology and artificial intelligence, information technology has further enhanced the ability to predict. The most common example is the recommendation algorithms in all kinds of scenarios, where various companies are trying to predict the activities of their customers as early and as accurately as possible.

Information technology is a key tool for productivity, and its core value lies in the exponential increase in the efficiency of the exchange of data, information, and knowledge, which improves the efficiency of social production. Information technology can increase the wealth that would otherwise be generated in a year, to be accomplished in a month, and in the future, it is likely to make it possible to accomplish in a month the wealth that would otherwise be generated in ten or twenty years.

More y, the development of information technology is dismantling existing economic and political structures. The change of economic structure can be felt by everyone, such as e-commerce makes the original channel as the king of the collapse of the sales model, but also produces a factory to the user's customized production and sales model; the change of the political structure is still just budding, the recent survey shows that facebook potentially affects the election of a number of countries in the future the impact of social media on the political structure will be even more extensive, through the social events, economic events, and political events, the impact of social media will be more extensive. events, economic events and political events to force the reform or change of the political structure.

As information technology evolves further, data is captured more broadly, and artificial intelligence is applied more y, who can be sure that every decision they make is a free choice, and that the election of a president is the result of democracy?

Whether it's the division between free capital markets and state capital markets, or between democratic and centralized politics, it's all being influenced, changed, and even reconfigured by this kind of information technology in the future. I'm optimistic that technology is neutral, but the application of technology by human beings is ultimately for the better, and so is the transformation of society, which is always for the better.

Since I learned about genetics in middle school, I have marveled at the mystery and magic of genes. Recently, I have also been doing gene-related work, coupled with the initial accumulation of chronic disease data management and medical data in the previous two years, I have always believed that a series of geriatric diseases such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and cancers can be overcome, and that the growth of human life expectancy has forced humans to deal with such geriatric diseases head-on. Sometimes I wonder if cancer and other age-related diseases are an accumulation of bug errors that occur after the machine code of genes has been running for a certain period of time. But in any case, human understanding of genes, consciousness, and cognition is getting deeper, and in the future it is foreseeable that gene editing will make people smarter, live longer, and even preserve their consciousness.

Does all this bring back another question, is there still equality in human life? I have never believed in equality, equality is always relative, at least in the current equality is everyone from the womb to the world, not more than others in the biological characteristics of the inherent advantages, but the future will likely break such equality. I don't want to be pessimistic about this, but the reality of the situation is that it will be very likely to create such inequality. Because high wealth holders can use advanced biomedical technologies to live longer and smarter lives, and even pass that advantage on from generation to generation.

As Chad Dawkins and Yuval Hurari have argued, humans are not simply controlled by genes, and human nature shines because of the ability to build a culture, or gossip, that allows people to build *** the same behavioral frameworks and goals for the betterment of humanity.

Looking back at human history, looking forward to the future of humanity, many times we know what kind of situation we are currently facing, so that we can make ourselves to the good and born.

The same is true for individuals, to live and survive well, for the sake of their own and more people's happiness and well-being.