Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - What exactly is the difference between the male and female versions of the East China Normal University math textbooks?
What exactly is the difference between the male and female versions of the East China Normal University math textbooks?

The biggest difference between the men's and women's versions is the difficulty and the content of the courses.

In our common perception, men are more talented in mathematics and science, and women are weak in this area, and very often can not keep up with the teacher's pace. So the East China Normal University math tutorials, take advantage of this inertia in our thinking to do marketing tools, launched such a for men and women targeted tutorials.

But once online, many people will feel that this textbook is engaged in the behavior of gender inequality. That is to say, they look down on women, thinking that women's IQ in math is much worse than men's, so they were verbally attacked by many netizens.

But it's really hard to say whether this is really the case or not, because the content of the book here does change somewhat. And the male version of the female version is also mainly in its cover, the content of the words does not involve the relationship between men and women. There is also no explanation of the gender differences between men and women.

Only going along with the accepted idea of optimizing these contents in a reasonable way. Making the male ones more suitable for men and the female ones more suitable for women. So it's not really possible to say whether the contents of this set are good or not, and whether they are suitable for the development of our separate sexes, only the parents as well as the children who have bought them will know.

But professors at this school have also publicly fielded the idea that males have a greater aptitude for math. It was directly said that if girls are indeed very good and have better grades in math, then they should choose the male version. Within this atmosphere, there is indeed some discrimination against the female version.

But personally, I think the book's starting point is good, and he didn't intentionally think to make the relationship between men and women unequal. Rather, he was thinking about the goal of improving everyone's academic performance, and wanted to for women who are disadvantaged in math to improve their math skills.

When we are in our classes, we can often come across a lot of girls who are really poor in math, and would be more advantageous in language subjects. That's why the intention of launching such a math tutor is still to help women rather than to disrespect them.