In fact, I don't quite understand this practice of this publishing house. As a publishing house owned by a prestigious school, did they make this move to attract people's attention? I really can't imagine why they would do it if they didn't simply need to attract people's attention. On the surface, it seems that big data is used for analysis, but I think the core of their publication of these two books is hormones. It is not the content of the book that is vulgar, but their behavior is vulgar.
It's 2020, why would anyone impose these labels on men and women? Are women necessarily inferior to men in mathematics? Isn't it enough that many female science champions in the college entrance examination can't beat their inherent ideas? Can the individual differences between everyone and everyone be distinguished by just one big data analysis? You are studying math for men and women now, so why don't you take the exam for men and women? This series of questions represents the public's disappointment with this publishing house.
And if there is no difference in the difficulty of the topic content, what is the purpose of your painstaking efforts to separate the male version from the female version? Will this score hit girls and bring them greater psychological pressure? Sometimes, prejudice and discrimination are the hardest to eliminate. Didn't the publishing house think about the pressure that publishing this book will bring to female students?
Why are netizens so controversial? Because I don't want my children to be discriminated against, the concept of equality between men and women has long been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, but there are always some people who think that girls are not as good as boys. This idea is a cancer of society and should be eliminated. In a sense, this publishing house's practice of dividing men's edition into women's edition has not promoted men's and women's learning more reasonably, but only brought endless discrimination and pressure.