Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - Top Ten Research Hot Spots for Innovation 2.0
Top Ten Research Hot Spots for Innovation 2.0
The development of new-generation information technology promotes the evolution of the next generation of human-centered, user-participatory innovation (Innovation 2.0) in the knowledge society. Innovation 2.0 is characterized by user innovation, open innovation, mass innovation, and collaborative innovation. With the interaction and development of the new generation of information technology and innovation 2.0, people's way of life, work, organization, and social form are undergoing profound changes, and the construction of industry, government, society, democratic governance, cities, and other fields should grasp this trend, and promote the evolution and development of new forms such as Enterprise 2.0, Government 2.0, Society 2.0, Cooperative Democracy, and Smart Cities. Summarizing the discussions of teachers and experts in the Innovation 2.0 Research Community over the past year, "Top Ten Hot Spots of Innovation 2.0 Research" summarizes the ten key directions of Innovation 2.0 research in 2015.

Direction 1: The development of new-generation information technology and its interaction and evolutionary trend with Innovation 2.0. The development of new-generation information technology has given birth to Innovation 2.0, and Innovation 2.0 in turn acts with the formation and development of new-generation information technology forms, reshaping the new forms of new-generation information technology such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Cloud Computing, Social Computing, and Big Data. The development of new-generation information technology in turn promotes the development and evolution of innovation 2.0 models, such as Living Lab, Fab Lab, AIP, Wiki, Prosumer, Crowdsource, and so on. Wiki (Wiki mode), Prosumer (consumer), Crowdsourcing (crowdsourcing) and other typical innovation 2.0 modes are constantly emerging. Internet economy and Internet thinking is a hot spot in the current innovation 2.0 research and practice promotion. In addition to ubiquitous network, there are ubiquitous computing, ubiquitous data and ubiquitous knowledge, which together promote ubiquitous innovation and the evolution of digital to intelligence and further to wisdom, and promote the evolution and development of "Internet+". The development of artificial intelligence technology, including deep learning neural networks, as well as drones, unmanned vehicles, smart wearable devices, and clusters of AI group systems and extended terminals, will further promote the disruptive development of people's existing lifestyles, socio-economics, industrial models, and cooperation patterns. @SongGang-mGovLab @ZhangNan-TsinghuaPublicManagement @ZhuHui In the article "Research on the Complexity of Urban Management and Response Strategies Based on Big Data", we have made a preliminary discussion on the interactive evolution of the two. The feature article "2014 DIY SMART CITY Social Innovation Summit*** discusses Innovation 2.0 and Smart Cities" on "Innovation 2.0 and Smart Eco-Cities" reports on the progress and discussions of Innovation 2.0 research and cutting-edge practices in various countries around the world. The development trend of new-generation information technology driven by Innovation 2.0, the evolution trend of Innovation 2.0 model driven by the development of new-generation information technology, and the research on its interaction mechanism deserve high attention.

Direction 2: Open Source and Innovation 2.0. @Lu Shouqun has organized a discussion on Open Source and Innovation 2.0 in the Innovation 2.0 Research Group, which can be found in @Song Xinzhou's review of the group's discussion, "Open Source Innovation in the Era of Innovation 2.0", and in this column's interview, "Lu Shouqun: The Interaction between Open Source and Innovation 2.0*** Integration can be a model for each other". Open knowledge management represented by the wiki model has also generated quite inspiring discussions in the group, see the article "Design and Application of Government Wiki System Based on Open Knowledge Management" by @SongGang-mGovLab @DongXiaoying et al. in collaboration with @SongGang-mGovLab. From open source, to open data, open knowledge management is becoming a trend in the 2.0 era of knowledge society innovation. Even the electric car Tesla is open source, even the government, the most conservative organization, tries to open data, and even the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is going to open research and open knowledge management. How open data, open source, and open knowledge in the Innovation 2.0 era will develop and evolve and drive the ****hedonic knowledge economy and knowledge society. There is also the "point of mixed ownership" and "point of ****productivism" mentioned by @Cui Zhiyuan.

Direction 3: The wave of creators and innovation and entrepreneurship under the "new normal". The development of information technology and the Internet economy, the diffusion of information and knowledge has promoted the democratization of innovation, and the wave of the new technological revolution, together with the transformation of economic development and structural adjustment, has brought about a new normal and a new pattern of innovation-driven development. The "new normal" emphasizes taking the mass line of the innovation 2.0 era and the road of sustainable and coordinated economic and social development, realizing the transformation of the economic development mode, and taking the innovation-driven road of connotative development.Fab Lab and the global wave of creators it triggered is a typical manifestation of the innovation 2.0 mode in the field of design and manufacturing, which triggered the transition from personal communication to personal computing to personal design. It has triggered the transformation of socio-technical development from personal communication to personal computing to personal design and personal manufacturing, promoted the construction of a user-centered and application-oriented user innovation environment integrating creativity, design and manufacturing, and brought new opportunities for mass entrepreneurship, mass innovation and open innovation. The value of human-centeredness, user innovation and user experience implied by Innovation 2.0 is becoming more and more prominent. In this regard, you can see @Tsinghua Academy of Fine Arts_Fu Zhiyong's interpretation of the creator movement and user experience in the construction of smart cities in his article "Collaborative Design Innovation Practices for Smart Cities".

Direction 4: Development and trends of the new industrial revolution driven by next-generation innovation. As @Lu Shouqun mentioned in the discussion, the third industrial revolution and industry 4.0 are new forms and trends of industry under the form of innovation 2.0, how do we respond to its opportunities and challenges? In the field of industrial development, Britain and the United States put forward the third industrial revolution, and Germany put forward industry 4.0. Germany expects to implement disruptive innovation in the implementation of industry 4.0 according to the mode of innovation 2.0 (industry 1.0-3.0 is the mode of innovation 1.0 in industrial society, and industry 4.0 is the mode of innovation 2.0 in the knowledge society), and to build a "virtual-physical system CPS" to build a global first-class manufacturing system. To build a global first-class manufacturing power by constructing a "virtual-physical system CPS". After China's 18th National Congress, China has implemented the development strategy of "industrialization, informatization, urbanization, and agricultural modernization", and as pointed out by @Zhu Hui in the overview review of the discussion of the Innovation 2.0 Research Community, "Industry 4.0: Responding to Industrial Innovation in the Era of Innovation 2.0", it is necessary to carry out subversive innovation under the guidance of Innovation 2.0, and to transform The need for disruptive innovation under the guidance of Innovation 2.0 will transform the "global manufacturing powerhouse" into the "global manufacturing powerhouse". The new industrial revolution converges with the ecological revolution and the wave of creators to further promote the trends of new energy, green ecology, intelligent manufacturing and open source creation.

Direction 5: Smart City Research under the Evolution of Innovation Patterns. Smart city is a new generation of information technology support, knowledge society, the next generation of innovation (innovation 2.0) under the environment of the city form. Smart city should not only focus on the construction of intelligent infrastructure such as comprehensive and thorough perception, broadband ubiquitous interconnection and intelligent fusion application, but also build an institutional environment and ecology conducive to the emergence of innovation by means of the concept of innovation 2.0, realize the people-oriented sustainable innovation characterized by user innovation, open innovation, public innovation, collaborative innovation, shape the value of the urban public*** and create unique value for each citizen living in the city, and realize the value of the city's public*** and create a unique value for the citizens. It will shape the city's public ****value and create unique value for every citizen living in the city, realizing the sustainable development of the city and the region. The guiding role of Mr. Qian Xuesen's Dacheng Wisdom Theory in the construction of smart cities is increasingly being paid attention to by the research field of smart cities, and how to promote the guidance and application of the Dacheng Wisdom Theory in smart cities will also become a research hotspot. See @SongGang-mGovLab @ZhuHui @TongYunHai's article "Innovation 2.0 and Smart Cities under the Perspective of Qian Xuesen's Dacheng Wisdom Theory".

Direction 6: Government 2.0 under the perspective of Innovation 2.0. 2014 @Meng Qingguo - Tsinghua Public Management @Zhang Nan - Tsinghua Public Management and other teachers at Tsinghua University in the organization of China's first government 2.0 seminar. In the field of government governance, innovation 2.0 redefines the relationship between management and service, and the government should serve rather than steer or row the oars, and should grasp the trend of this government service model and form evolution, while focusing on the role of the government as an enabler in the innovation ecosystem, and promote open innovation, user innovation, mass innovation, and collaborative innovation through open government data, wikis, WeChat, microblogs, and other web2.0 applications, as well as open data and cloud applications. innovation, mass innovation, and collaborative innovation. See @SongGang-mGovLab @MengQingGuo-Tsinghua Public Management's article "Government 2.0: Government Innovation under the Vision of Innovation 2.0". As well as this column on the Tsinghua University "Government 2.0: innovation 2.0 vision of government governance" seminar summary "e-government academic * * * * the same body Tsinghua University * * * * discuss innovation 2.0 vision of government governance".

Direction 7: Opportunities and Development of Cooperative Democracy in the Era of Innovation 2.0. Innovation 2.0 is shaped by Science 2.0, Technology 2.0, Management and System 2.0*** together. In the context of promoting the modernization of national governance, the rule of law has been reiterated and the mass line has been reintroduced. How to walk the mass line in the era of innovation 2.0 and build the institutional environment in the era of innovation 2.0 is an important issue in promoting the modernization of national governance. In the article "From Government Wiki to Wiki Government: Cooperative Democracy in the Perspective of Innovation 2.0", @SongGang-mGovLab @WanPengfei et al. suggest that in the field of democratic governance, we should grasp the new opportunities of cooperative democracy in the era of Innovation 2.0, transcend the "failure of direct democracy and the impotence of consultative democracy", and promote the construction of socialist democracy with the characteristics of the times and Chinese characteristics. socialist democracy with the characteristics of the times and China's characteristics. Through the application of technology and social tools such as cloud computing, wikis, social networks, etc., based on Innovation 2.0, the public can communicate and interact more freely and proactively, and participate more y in the cooperation and synergy between the government and the society, so as to realize collaborative ****governance, group wisdom, and the shaping of public ****value based on the new technology.

Direction 8: The construction of "government-industry-university-research" collaborative innovation ecosystem for knowledge society innovation 2.0. The democratization of innovation in the knowledge society has driven the transformation of innovation patterns, redefined the value of users and the meaning of openness, and promoted the understanding of the innovation ecological model. For more on innovation ecology, see the book "Innovation Ecology" by @ Zhang Aiping / Pudong Economic and Information Commission @ Kong Huawei. Innovation 2.0 as an innovation ecology is also discussed in the feature story "2014 DIY SMART CITY SOCIAL INNOVATION SUMMIT*** discussing Innovation 2.0 and Smart Cities". How to realize the transformation of government 2.0, how to adapt to this trend of democratization of innovation will be "users" more y into the system of collaborative innovation, play the role of the user, especially the role of the leading users, to promote the cooperation between the government, the use of the industry, academia, research, from the past of the vertical organization of the enterprise into the model of the innovation ecology from the "industry-academia-research" to the "industry-academia-research" model. The "industry-academia-research" and "government-industry-academia-research" are moving towards the "government-use-industry-academia-research" collaborative innovation ecology for the knowledge society.

Direction 9: Open Data and Big Data. Big data in the era of innovation 2.0 and under the vision of complexity science not only provides new opportunities for the government to grasp the overall operation of the economy and society and realize the comprehensive management of the urban system, but also emphasizes the participation of the public, plays the role of each individual, realizes the convergence of knowledge, and forms the intellectual resources and knowledge service capacity to support decision-making, management and service. Open data is the foundation of big data, and it is crucial for the government to open data to promote open innovation and stimulate market and social vitality. For more information, please refer to the special reports of "China-West Open Innovation Dialogue, Online Innovation Dialogue" and "Open Data for Economic Development and Social Innovation" Seminar Successfully Held at Fudan University".

Direction 10: Crowdsourcing, Crowdfunding, Wizards and Innovation 2.0: Crowdsourcing is a typical mode of Innovation 2.0. Innovation 2.0 research group @Wang Qiang Xiamen through crowdsourcing crowdfunding synergistic "wizards and crowdsourcing" book will be published soon, and @Zhang Junhong through the discussion with @Liu Feng Internet evolution, is the initiative to launch the crowdsourcing writing "silicon-based civilization of the birth and evolution". In the Internet era, the flow of innovation resources has been greatly enhanced, and open innovation 2.0 has evolved from outsourcing to industrial cooperation, and further changed into "government, industry, academia and research" organizations or individuals with innovation capabilities. Innovation 2.0 era provides new opportunities for capital, production, market, cooperation and other ways, individual innovation is no longer stuck in the creative stage, and further promote innovation and mass entrepreneurship.

Meng Qingguo,Song Gang,Zhang Nan. Top Ten Hot Spots of Innovation 2.0 Research[J]. Office Automation, 2015,(5): 6-9.