DUI DUI self-analysis materials1
According to the LinYing County Education Bureau LinYing County Education 20xx148 document "on the four party members and cadres and national public officials DUI typical cases of notification," as well as "to carry out the problem of DUI" to promote the improvement of the "notice" spirit, I through the DUI problem, I have been able to improve the quality of life of the people of the country. Notice" spirit, I seriously reflect on the education system through the investigation and handling of DUI typical cases to promote reform, by the wake-up call, understand the bottom line, know the fear, to find the root of these violations, the reasons, so as to further excavate from the depths of the soul to find the problem, seriously analyze the reasons for the existence of the problem. Here I combined with their own work, analysis is as follows:1, adhere to the "red line", strictly abide by the rules
"Refuse to drink and drive to promote the reform of the" activities carried out since the city, county and discipline inspection departments at all levels. Education Bureau and all levels of discipline inspection and supervision departments issued a lot of cases, but also reiterated a lot of documents and notices on the strengthening of party members and cadres and national public officials drunk driving problem. On the one hand, this reflects the great importance that leaders at all levels attach to the issue of drunk driving by party members, cadres and state officials, and it is also the "red line" that leaders at all levels and the disciplinary and supervisory departments have drawn for us to set up the rules, which is a "high-pressure line" that must not be touched, much less exceeded. My attitude towards these documents and notices is always the same: study carefully, experience carefully, know well, and strictly abide by them. These rules as their duties as the basic rules and regulations, to adhere to the "red line", strictly abide by the rules. To resist drunk driving with a high sense of responsibility, resolutely do not drink and drive, drive not drink, from the source to curb the behavior of drunk driving.2, prudent and cautious, fear of the rules
The rules are written on paper, can not be transformed into their own conscious action, not only to rely on the higher authorities and the majority of the supervision of the faculty and staff, and more importantly, they can not do "prudent" and "cautious". "Deliberate". Continuously in the work to improve their "training" and "determination", from the "heart", from "little by little". Grasp their own, the rules and systems should always have "fear of the heart", and strive to form a small preventive measures, see the slightest knowledge, rigorous and meticulous 'work style. All teachers and staff really realize that drinking and driving is the root cause of traffic safety accidents, is the root cause of family tragedies.3, to prevent the risk of clear rules
As the head of the school, the guardian of the territory is responsible, not only can not make mistakes in drunk driving, but also can not let the school staff to make mistakes. First, we must be good at finding and finding the right DUI risk prevention and control points, the causes of the risk of research and preventive measures, in line with the spirit of listening to the advice from the attitude of listening to all aspects of the pertinent views, adhere to the DUI risk prevention and control do not let up; Second, we must establish rules and regulations, clear rules, red lines, strengthen education, so that the majority of teachers and staff of the system in fear, do not dare to go one step beyond the minefield, to bring out a let the leadership to rest assured that the employees The first time I saw this, I had to go back to the office to get the information I needed. Due to the level of personal understanding, ideological awareness of the limitations, there may be some issues against the not deep enough, not comprehensive enough, not accurate enough. "Refuse to drink and drive, in order to improve" analysis is not necessarily in place, please leadership and comrades to criticize and correct. I will accept, seriously improve.DUI DUI self-analysis materials2
First, the basic case
Li Mou, in the **** party members, the state of a former deputy director of the Administration. XX the evening of XX, Li Mou drinking and driving to the unit to get materials, was on duty police seized, and extracted venous blood in the body to be retained. After judicial appraisal, Li Mou blood alcohol content of / 100ml, has reached the national human blood alcohol content standards for drunkenness, Li Mou suspected of committing the crime of dangerous driving was released on bail pending trial. Subsequently, Li was removed from his post. xx years x month x day, a people's court made a criminal verdict, found that Li's behavior has constituted the crime of dangerous driving, in view of its plea of guilty, repentance attitude is good, according to the law on the mitigating punishment and probation, sentenced to one month of detention, probation for two months, a fine of one thousand yuan. Li did not appeal, the judgment has come into effect.Second, the treatment of opinions
Li's behavior, his unit of discipline inspection committee, according to the "China's *** production party disciplinary regulations" article 33, paragraph 1, paragraph 1 of the "because of intentional crimes were sentenced to criminal law provisions of the main penalty (including the pronouncement of suspended sentence) However, taking into account the mitigating circumstances that he has a good attitude in admitting his faults, took the initiative to report to the Party Committee and Discipline Inspection Commission of the unit where he worked at the first time after the problem arose, his work performance has always been good, and his drunken driving did not cause any adverse consequences, can he be expelled from the Party on the basis of article 17 of the Disciplinary Regulations of the CPC, which states that "depending on the circumstances of the case, a person who has been sentenced by law to the principal punishment prescribed in the Criminal Law (including a suspended sentence) for an intentional crime", can the CPC be expelled from the Party? According to the provisions of Article 17 of the Regulations, "In the light of the special circumstances of a case, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection shall decide, or the provincial (ministerial) discipline inspection committees (excluding the discipline inspection committees of sub-provincial municipalities) shall decide and submit to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection for approval, that a Party member who has violated the disciplinary rules may be subject to a reduced penalty beyond the range of penalties provided for in the present Regulations". The party is on probation for two years. After careful study, we analyzed the two issues involved in this case. (A) drunk driving constitutes a crime whether all expelled from the party. Drunk driving behavior is highly dangerous, very easy to cause accidents, a serious threat to the lives of the majority of people, property safety. In order to intensify the fight against such behavior, the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII), which came into force on May 1, XX, provides that drunken driving on the road can be sentenced to detention, and fines. Party members and cadres who violate the criminal law should be how to give party and political disciplinary measures, the Chinese **** production party constitution, article 38, paragraph 2, stipulates: "serious violation of the criminal law party members must be expelled from the party." Article 33, paragraph 1, of the Regulations on Disciplinary Measures of the Chinese ****anufacturing Party stipulates that a Party member shall be expelled from the Party under one of the following three circumstances: firstly, if he has been sentenced by law to the principal punishment prescribed by the Criminal Law (including the pronouncement of a suspended sentence) for an intentional crime; secondly, if he has been deprived of his political rights, whether singly or additionally; and thirdly, if he has been sentenced by law to fixed-term imprisonment of more than three years (excluding three years) for an offence committed through negligence. Article 17, paragraph 2, of the Regulations on Disciplinary Measures for Civil Servants of Administrative Organs stipulates that: "A civil servant of an administrative organ who has been sentenced to a criminal penalty in accordance with the law shall be dismissed from the service." Therefore, in this case, according to the above provisions should be given to Li Mou expulsion from the party, administrative expulsion. It should be noted that, for drunk driving was exempted from criminal penalties of party cadres, according to the "Chinese ****anufacturing Party Disciplinary Regulations," the provisions of Article 32, should also be given to revoke the party position above the punishment. (ii) whether the case can apply special mitigating circumstances. Article 33, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 of the Disciplinary Regulations of the Communist Party of China "for intentional crimes were sentenced to the main penalty prescribed by the criminal law (including the pronouncement of probation)" should be given to the expulsion of the Party's circumstances, can not be applied to the "Disciplinary Regulations of the Communist Party of China" Article 17 of the special mitigating circumstances. This is because if such cases are allowed to be subject to special mitigating circumstances, that is to say, if such cases are allowed not to be expelled from the Party, then this would conflict with the provisions of article 38, paragraph 2, of the Constitution of the Communist Party of China (CPC), which stipulates that "a Party member who has committed a serious violation of the criminal law must be expelled from the Party". The Constitution of the Communist Party of China (CPC) is the fundamental law of the Party, and is the basic guideline for all Party laws and regulations, and the specific application of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of the Communist Party of China (CPC) cannot break through the provisions of the Constitution of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Therefore, to meet the "China *** party disciplinary regulations" article 33, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 of the circumstances of disciplinary action, can not be applied to "China *** party disciplinary regulations" article 17 of the provisions of the mitigating punishment. In this case, Li's behavior should be given the punishment of expulsion from the party, can not be given two years probationary punishment.