It is true that "strange things happen every year, but this year there are especially many", and the recent topic of many people in Shanghai "being born a child" on a hot search, things are like this:

Shanghai Ms. Lan, when she went to go through the relevant procedures, she was told she had a "son" born in 2008, which made her very surprised, and her husband also suspected that her "son" is who? In 2008, she was told that she had a "son" who was born in 2008, which made her very surprised, and her husband also suspected that her "son" is who's? Later, the media intervened to clear Ms. Lan's name, and it turned out that her ID card had been lost and stolen.

Shanghai's Mr. Wu, after seeing Ms. Lan's encounter, also wanted to check his own family members through the "family map". This check made him drop his jaw. His family chart actually also more than a son, and was born in 1990. Mr. Wu projected that his wife was still in secondary school at that time, 17 years old are pregnant? Not very realistic!

Please click to enter a picture description

There are some points of doubt in this matter that need to be clarified:

1. What should the wrongly-registered informant do in the above situation?

Currently these people are through the reporter to find various departments have been corrected, but can not be everyone to find a reporter to help it, as the administration should be introduced to a specific process, and has appeared many times this situation, the relevant departments are not also should be self-checked this information, after all, this is related to the public with every citizen, and has not seen the The main reason for this is the fact that it is a very important part of the process, and that is why it is so important.

2. Where did the wrong data come from?

Shanghai Big Data said that the associated data came from the police, the Health Commission and other departments, and that the original data may have been incomplete or incorrectly registered before this happened. Is it because the original data was registered incorrectly or is it an error in the process of summarizing the information? Was it a misuse in the registration process or was it invaded and maliciously tampered with? With so many cases of errors, what is the likelihood of malicious operation? Will there be unlawful profit-making in it?

3. How can we protect the rights of the victimized citizens if they are harmed by the wrong information?

According to the provisions of Article 27 of the "Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information", the Big Data Center is required to disclose the source of the extra children under its name, and where exactly the original information registered was wrong. After finding out the original error information, you can ask the relevant departments to correct the wrong information. They can also ask the relevant departments to take responsibility for apologizing and eliminating the impact if it causes them damaging consequences.

This incident suggests that we ordinary people:

We must pay more attention to their own personal information, to collect their own documents that can prove their identity, do not lend, do not outflow copies, if lost should be lost in a timely manner to replace the lost, not to give the opportunity to the lawless elements drilling loopholes, and to protect their own personal information not to be misregistered, to avoid greater losses. Avoid greater losses.