With Jay Chou's bad data on the hot search event, I said from the data can not represent a star's popularity and heat

A star's heat and popularity, in fact, can not be represented by the data, such as the heat of the bar, the heat of this thing to say, in fact, should be able to use the data to say, because the heat of the degree of people's attention, such as in the microblogging, the more people pay attention to this thing will be more times to search for this thing, then the number of times will become more. The more people pay attention to this matter, the number of times to search for this matter will become more, the more people pay attention to, the more people to search for, then the number of times will become more, and then in the microblogging above the data will increase, based on this example, if the data above the words, the heat should be able to use the data to express.

But for popularity, popularity is whether a star is noticed and loved by many people, if a star. If a star is very easy to be fan, and has many, many fans, has a very strong fan base, for example, every time this star has an interest in what activities or what works come out, there is a great deal of attention, and there are a lot of people willing to go to see him, or go to listen to his works. Then we can say that the star is very popular. So the data does not represent the popularity of a star, because as a star, there are a lot of people like him, this is very normal, some stars fans are willing to buy for him will be in his data will make a relatively large contribution, but there are some people like the star is in their own hearts silently like, and go to go to pay attention to his work, but will not be in the data to do something!

So if you use data to represent a star's popularity, it's not comprehensive.