Second, I am learning actuarial, so I think actuarial is very good, personal opinion, but the three professional, the most need for further study is also actuarial, in addition, very bitter, no kidding, is definitely the three inside the most bitter, and, to be certified; you do not want to deepen the study, then the financial
Third, do not exist a fallacy, economics is liberal arts, economics is not practical, I personally think, so that people are definitely not a financial professional, at least, on the financial professional understanding is not very deep; economics majors in mathematics have high requirements, absolutely no less than statistics, as for the practicality of it or not, that depends on what direction you go, I think that both the direction of the macro direction or measurement direction are very practical and Very research - of course, very bitterFourth, finance is not liberal arts, because it is too fraternity, anything, but universal; talking about goldsmithing, do not feel that goldsmithing is very sacred, because the domestic goldsmithing has just started, experimental disciplines, basically based on finance, I would think that you can directly study Finance - in fact, they are almost the same, the reason see the first article. The more obvious difference between goldwork and finance is that you have to learn a bunch of math and computers. And actuarial are very hard professional
Fourth, in advance to do a good job of graduate school, graduate school, abroad, under the CFA/CPA/ASA/CSA and other difficult to test but very valuable documents to prepare for the study of finance and economics directly out of the employment, is not very difficult, how to say, you will see a lot of bulls in front of you in front of the flying yellow, you will be very itchy in the heart, but busy and have no time to enrich their own! So, you are still in the university four years of hard work it; learned other I dare not say, learn actuarial, do this preparation, otherwise will regret.