Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - Why do some people specifically reject the census?
Why do some people specifically reject the census?

There are not many people who really reject the census, and the main reason for this situation is that the seven-person census is different from the previous one. I have participated in the six-person census, and although I am not working in this area now, there are relatives in my family who have participated in the seven-person census, and frankly speaking, this time the seven-person census was not coordinated well in a few organizational and scheduling aspects.

When it comes to the six-person survey, each person is responsible for his or her own area, and the existing residents are the targets, so they can just go to their homes and fill out the forms, which can usually be done in one go.

But over the years, socio-economic development has changed dramatically, and with the mobility of people, there are more and more cases of people being separated from their households. When it comes to the seven-member Pu, not only to verify the mobility of the population and the separation of households, the former is mostly seen in the new buildings to move in, the latter is mostly seen in the old neighborhoods, verification is very cumbersome, so that there will be a number of times to ask, repeat the questioning of the situation.

For example, if a person lives in the A district, the account in the B district, six people Pu, directly to the A district to find a person can be B district probably know the basic situation of this person on the line, at most, each asked once. The seven people to the time, only ask once is most likely not enough, the place of residence and household registration repeat inquiries, not fire is strange.

So the problem of organization and coordination, for example, the publicity said that the census began on November 1, but in fact, in September-October, it was already underway: the base book needs to be entered in advance ah. From a certain point of view, on October 30, the census is already over, the base book must be completed by November 1, the later long and short forms are based on this. November 1 census, in fact, refers to the long and short forms entered, the base book is completed before, the publicity to understand this thing, no.

There is one more thing to say: the design of the form for system entry is flawed.

The three data indicators M5, M6, M7, for example, M6 does not reflect the "mapping of the household in the jurisdiction of other census districts," such as the case, if the community or village staff is okay, they do a better job of information sharing, but now those volunteers or property volunteers, there is a possibility of Mistakes and omissions and duplication of survey inquiries.

In addition, there are three data indicators M9, M10, M11, this time, M10 is reflected in the "mapping of other census tracts in the jurisdiction of this situation", but missed another situation: not living in the household, living in other houses in the census tract.

In this way, there is a problem in the entry: for example, a certain A, 1 person, in the same census tract to rent a neighbor's house or move to a relative's home. Then into this household survey, the actual situation is that this person is not in, M9 should be 1 person, but the back of the M10 and M11 can not be selected, selected is a logical error audit can not be: you can not choose him to live in the jurisdiction of the other census neighborhoods, but also can not say that he lives outside of this jurisdiction. In this case, if you want to pass the audit, you have to deduce yourself.

How the system shows the verification is not good to say, it is possible that the impact is not very big, but, such a big thing, the setting of the indicator data form, the necessary science and rigor is still necessary.

Finally, there are also deficiencies in the organization, six people in the general, the participation of volunteers is not much, seven people in the general is more complex, the workload is greater, so enlisted many volunteers to join. But this part of the people's cultural literacy and discipline is uneven, and it is estimated that the epidemic has also had an impact, resulting in insufficient centralized training.

Among the volunteers, student volunteers are more capable of accepting new things and operating easily. But the property side of the participation, mostly social volunteers, security guards, property managers, they operate the system is very difficult. Typical example is data uploading, some of them are not able to locate and upload the data. In addition, the relationship between property owners and property owners is already tense, and some property owners and social volunteers lack experience in working with the public and communication skills, which in this context exacerbates the resentment of property owners.

In short, the seven-person census is of epoch-making significance, with the accuracy and scientificity of the data exceeding that of the six-person census, and is a preview of the era of big data, which is inherently very complex, coupled with the impact of the social environment and epidemics, with varying degrees of shortcomings in various aspects. Rejection of the census is not the mainstream, more people are tired of being asked, whining, in fact, can be understood.