Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - The first is that the system is not the same as the other systems, but it is different from the other systems.
The first is that the system is not the same as the other systems, but it is different from the other systems.

The Zhi.com and Wanfang weight checking are both the most commonly used systems for checking papers nowadays, and each of them has different differences, and we can only use them for the category of our papers after we understand that they differ from each other. Here we will learn what are the differences between Zhi.com and Wanfang!

One, Wanfang and Zhifang which check weight strict, how much difference

Compared to Zhifang check, Wanfang check due to the limited coverage of its database leads to its standards are too broad, in Wanfang detection, sometimes get 0% detection results, while using the same article in Zhifang detection but get 70% -80% repetition rate detection results. Comparison of its data source is different, is also one of the main reasons for the two in the detection results of the existence of large differences. Some of the content of the paper for Zhiwei check only has the significance of reference, and Wanfang check does not include the English database, once the article involves the English language, Wanfang is unable to use the check on it.

Secondly, the price of checking the weight of Zhi.com and Wanfang?

1, Wanfang's checking and testing price is about 9 yuan / 10,000 characters, and its checking accuracy is more than 85%, which is suitable for the initial checking of college students and title appraisers.

2, Zhihua checking system has five, it has different prices, the following table for you to detailed examples out.

Three, Zhi.com and Wanfang which check weight is better?

Relatively speaking, Wanfang's database is smaller than that of Zhi.com, and its accuracy is not enough, but Wanfang's price is cheaper than that of Zhi.com, and Wanfang is suitable for the initial checking, while Zhi.com is more suitable for the finalization of the final draft. The following is a detailed analysis of the databases of Zhi.com and Wanfang, the detection portal, the literature citation detection and duplication rate and chart similarity detection to give you a detailed analysis.

(1) The difference between Zhi.com and Wanfang's checking databases

1. Wanfang's checking databases are mainly as follows:

(1) China Scholarly Periodicals Database CSPD,

(2) China Dissertation Full Text Database CDDB,

(3) China Academic Conference Papers Database CCPD,

(4) China Academic Webpage Database CSWD,

2, Zhiwei checking databases are mainly the following:

(1) China Academic Journals Network Publishing Database

(2) China Doctoral Dissertation Full-text Database/China Outstanding Master's Degree Dissertation Full-text Database

(3) China Important Conference Thesis Full-text Database

(4) Full-text Database of Important Chinese Newspapers

(5) Full-text Database of Chinese Patents

(6) Joint Comparison Database of College Students' Dissertations

(7) Internet Resources

(8) English Databases (covering the English data of journals, doctoral dissertations, and conferences, as well as the databases of Springer (Germany), Taylor& Francis journals (England), etc.)

(9) Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan Academic Literature Library

(10) Priority Publishing Literature Library

(11) Internet Document Resource

(12) Book Resource

(13) Individual Comparison Library

Note: From the perspective of databases alone, Zhi.com's databases are obviously more comprehensive than Wanfang's Some of them are more comprehensive than Wanfang.

(2) Differences in detection portals

1. There are two portals in Wanfang's system, one is "Detecting Published Papers", which is mainly for all the literature published before the papers are sent for inspection, and is suitable for detecting title papers; the other is "Detecting New Papers", which is suitable for detecting graduation papers; the other is "Detecting New Papers", which is suitable for detecting graduation papers. The other portal is "Detect New Papers", which is applicable to the detection of graduation theses, newly submitted papers, and so on.

2. There are five systematic detection entrances of Knowledge Network Testing, mainly including the academic misconduct literature detection system for journals (AMLC), the academic misconduct literature detection system for social sciences journals (SMLC), the academic misconduct detection system for dissertations (TMLC), the college student dissertation management system of "China Knowledge Network" (PMLC), and the academic misconduct system of academic misconduct. PMLC) and Academic Misconduct Literature Detection System (VIP), which divides different entrances for college students' specialized, undergraduate, master's degree doctoral and title dissertations

Note: The dissertation similarity detection service of Wanfang Data's Knowledge Service Platform does not categorize the different requirements for literature searches, and the detection language is limited to Chinese, but as you can see from the above, Zhi.com's detection classification is a bit more comprehensive and has a Targeted.

(3) The difference between citation detection and repetition rate

1. The citation detection and repetition rate characterization in Wanfang's checking report is relatively concise, and in the overall conclusion, it only gives "total similarity ratio", "reference similarity ratio" and "exclusion similarity ratio". " and "excluded references similarity ratio". In the distribution of similar segments, the green area is used to characterize the position of similar parts of references, the red area is the similar parts with other uncited papers, and the authors of similar papers and typical similar papers and their total similarity ratios of typical segments are listed. The overall characterization is more objective and does not provide a conclusive evaluation of the paper.

2. The citation detection and duplication rate characterization of the KnowledgeNet checking and testing system is relatively complex, and in the overall conclusion, the total text replication ratio, the removal of cited literature replication ratio, the removal of the replication ratio of my own published literature and the maximum text replication ratio of a single article are given, and the text replication portion is indicated by the red text, and the cited portion is indicated by the yellow text and the plagiarized text is given a detailed representation. According to the ratio of replication of published literature to oneself, it is clearly indicated whether it is self-plagiarism, multiple submissions or repeated publications; according to the ratio of replication of cited literature and the ratio of maximum text replication of a single article, it is determined whether the paper is over-quoted, plagiarized ideas or plagiarized as a whole, and other conclusions.

Note: From the conclusion of the repetition rate test, the authors are required to strictly cite the literature in the process of writing the paper, even if they cite their own published papers, they have to cite them with references, or else there will be the consequences of self-plagiarism; and the citation of the literature should not be over-cited, or else there will be a suspicion of multiple submissions (excessive citation of their own papers) and plagiarism (excessive citation of other people's papers).

But as long as you respect intellectual property rights and other people's achievements, strictly cite the literature, and do not over-cite, even if the total copy ratio of the paper is high, it will not lead to academic misconduct, because most of the time, the detection of the conclusion to take into account the "removal of cited literature copy ratio".

(D) chart similarity detection

The chart, as a part of the paper, has a particularly important significance in the original innovation, characterization, and revealing the law, and a lot of the original data are also implied in the chart.

However, in the dissertation similarity detection, both Wanfang detection system and CNKI Zhiwei checking and detection system seem to be unable to detect the charts and graphs. Among them, Wanfang dissertation similarity detection system does not have the detection of charts and graphs; CNKI checking and detection system has a very low recognition rate of data tables, and there is no graph recognition function at present. The limitations of the detection system, especially the lack of similarity diagram recognition function, lead to certain thesis authors to speculate in the detection process, especially the dissertation.

The above is the "know the difference between the net and Wanfang check", from the above comparison, know the net check than Wanfang check or know the net check is more comprehensive, of course, is not Wanfang is not good, just relatively speaking, Wanfang is suitable for the initial check, and know the net is more suitable for the final draft. So you can choose according to the stage of your dissertation