Non-governmental investment and financing consulting services. The loan interest is not higher than 2 points, and Weifang has the lowest interest, which is the first choice for your loan. The loan company will sue you if it can't find anyone. After winning the case, he will apply for enforcement. There is nothing he can do. And not criminally responsible, this is available all over the country, and the intermediary helps you buy a car with zero down payment. Then go to the bank for a loan, and use the bank loan until you don't want to borrow.
Sell the house and car at a low price, and return the money from the bank if you have money. Non-governmental loan companies don't pay back the money, one at a time, which is a legal loophole in lending to non-governmental loan companies.
Take the purchase contract to the bank to do real estate mortgage, and now it is basically done. You can take the real estate license home or go to a formal loan company.
Compare which one has low interest rate and high credit, and what is the relationship between B, C and A loans? If three * * * loans are made by the same company and divided into three loans, A's relatives can't bear the part beyond the inheritance, and obviously can't pay off all the debts. If all the loans are made in the name of the company, A's relatives have no legal responsibility for the debts. If the company is in other circumstances, A's relatives can bear the debt repayment responsibility, but only if they inherit part of the inheritance or bring a lawsuit to the court. B, whether the heirs of family property should participate in debt repayment. This is very complicated. I suggest you supplement the relevant information and give you a detailed analysis. As you said, several key points involved in this case are not clear, so B can't fully pay off the debt, and C is jointly and severally liable for the repayment of A's loan. When A (for whatever reason) cannot repay the loan, B and C will repay the debt first (after the loan is repaid). Legally speaking? Or a three-way mutual insurance loan? Or B and C guarantee A's loan, and other partners. As you said, since B and C have repaid the loan from Weifang Bank for A, they are in the same position as other creditors. This 6.5438+0.8 million should be distributed to loan banks such as B and C according to the proportion of debts, and C has obtained the subrogation right of Weifang Bank. On the premise of no priority creditor's rights, this 654.38+0.80 W should be distributed to all creditors in proportion through legal channels. Even if all the company's assets are used to pay off debts, the total executable value of Company A is only about 180W, and its foreign debt reaches 400W? Is it a joint-stock company? Partnership company? Limited company or unlimited company? All these determine how many assets a company should have to pay off its debts, and what kind of company A is. If a company is found to have the behavior of transferring property or evading debts, it can report to the public security economic investigation department, and they have the right to recover debts from Company A). If it is the last case, then there is no essential relationship between B and C and A's loan debt? Or maybe the three companies have nothing to do with each other and just borrowed money from each other? If it is the first three cases.