Unified social credit code/registration number: 915200005733164247 Legal representative: Yang Kuaile Registration Authority: Guizhou Provincial Administration for Industry and Commerce was established on 201.
Who is the legal representative of Liuzhou Yujun Co., Ltd. in Guangxi? Hello, this is a privacy issue. I suggest you directly inquire about the company's enterprise information on Guangxi Hongdun.
Legal Representative of Shanxi Zhongxinbei Xinyao Coal Industry Co., Ltd.: Ma Yinchang Registration Authority: Shanxi Administration for Industry and Commerce Date of Establishment: 201year 65438+February 3 1 day.
The business license is the identity certificate of the legal representative of Beijing No.3 Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.
When bidding, the unit will issue a certificate of legal representative, and then affix the official seal of the unit, followed by the business license of the unit.
Who is the current legal representative of Muchuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. You can inquire on the website of "National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System" of the General Administration.
The legal representative of a limited liability company commits loan fraud in the name of the company. How to characterize the behavior of the legal representative as a loan fraud?
1, the actor subjectively has the purpose of illegal possession. The so-called crime of loan fraud refers to the act of fabricating false reasons such as introducing funds and projects for the purpose of illegal possession, using false contracts, using false documents and false property rights certificates as guarantees, repeatedly guaranteeing beyond the value of collateral, or defrauding banks or other financial institutions of a large amount by other means. When determining this crime, it is a very important standard to plead guilty that the actor subjectively has the purpose of illegal possession. In judicial practice, whether illegal possession is the purpose is usually the key to distinguish crime from non-crime. Moreover, judging from the provisions of China's current criminal law and relevant judicial interpretations, the purpose of illegal possession required to constitute a crime is not necessarily premeditated beforehand, but can be generated afterwards, such as concealing the whereabouts of the loan and refusing to repay the loan after the expiration of the loan period as stipulated in the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Fraud Cases. It can be seen that the purpose of illegal possession in the above circumstances does not need to be premeditated beforehand, and if it refuses to repay the loan without justifiable reasons afterwards, it can be regarded as subjective illegal possession. Combined with the situation of this case, the legal representative of the defendant did not transfer the loan to the company account after borrowing, but used it for private use, and refused to repay it after the loan expired. This behavior is enough to show that it has the purpose of illegal possession. Moreover, he borrowed a large amount from the bank by virtue of his legal person status and company name, which also showed that the actor had the intention of fraud when borrowing. And objectively, it is also illegal to occupy loans. According to the principle of the same subject and object, it should be recognized that the legal representative subjectively has the purpose of illegal possession.
2. The legal representative objectively carried out a series of fraudulent acts.
First of all, the collateral provided by the legal representative when lending to the bank is illegal. According to the principle of good faith required by the Civil Law and the Guarantee Law and the requirement that the subject matter must be legal, the legal representative concealed the fact that the Honda car he bought was a smuggled car, and once it was discovered, it could be seized at any time, and still used illegal things as collateral, which was subjectively fraudulent.
Secondly, the legal representative, as the legal representative of the company, does have the right to make various legal acts in the name of the company. However, its legal person behavior must be within the scope authorized by the company and must be based on the interests of the company. In this case, the loan decision made by the legal representative was entirely for his own benefit, and all the loans were misappropriated, not transferred to the company account, nor used for the company's development. According to the denial of corporate personality in the Company Law, the company can deny that the behavior of the legal representative is the behavior of a legal person, which should be regarded as his personal behavior, and the actor himself should be responsible for his behavior. In this case, the legal representative's behavior completely violated the interests of the company, and his behavior was completely expressed according to his own will rather than the company's will. Based on this, it can be concluded that the behavior of the legal representative belongs to personal fraud. The behavior of the legal representative in this case does not constitute the so-called agency by estoppel. In this case, the legal representative signed a loan contract in the name of the company by taking advantage of his position. In China's judicial practice, signing a contract by stealing others' letters of introduction, contract seals or official seals is generally not recognized as agency by estoppel. Therefore, the company where the legal representative is located in this case can completely refuse bank recourse as long as it proves that the defendant's legal representative's behavior belongs to unauthorized use of the company name. Therefore, the direct object of the legal representative's behavior infringement is still the bank's loan ownership.
Who is the current legal representative of Huludao Bohai Shipbuilding Industry Co., Ltd.? Li tianbao
Who is the legal representative of Anyang Lidu Coal Co., Ltd.? Gu Liancai Registration Authority: Professional Branch of Anyang Administration for Industry and Commerce Date of establishment: 20 16 03 17.
Who is the legal representative of China Grain Storage Dongguan Company? Entrusted by the State Council, China Grain Reserve is specifically responsible for the operation and management of central grain reserves (including central reserve oil, the same below), taking overall responsibility for the total quantity, quality and storage safety of central grain reserves, and at the same time accepting the entrustment of the state to carry out control tasks such as the purchase, sale and storage of grain and oil. Under the national macro-control, supervision and management, the head office operates independently and is responsible for its own profits and losses. The main business scope of the head office is: grain and oil storage, processing, trade logistics, storage technology research and service. At present, COFCO has nine business segments, including COFCO Grain and Oil, COFCO Grain and Oil, China Food, Real Estate Hotel, China Native Animal, Tunhe, COFCO Packaging, COFCO Development and Finance. It owns China Food (HK0506), COFCO Holdings (HK0606), Tunhe (600737) and COFCO Real Estate (0003 1). Fulinmen Edible Oil, Great Wall Wine, Di Chin Chocolate, Tunhe Tomato Products, Jiajiakang Meat Products, Joy City ShoppingMall, Yalong Bay Resort, Gloria Hotel, Xuelian Cashmere, China Tea, Sino-British Life Rural Financial Services, etc. The combination of products and services of many brands has shaped the market reputation of COFCO with high quality and high taste. Hehe, China Grain Storage was established under the consideration of the national grain strategy, and COFCO is a state-owned enterprise with pure commercial operation. I hope to have some reference for you.