Legal analysis: under certain conditions, banks have the right to detain farmers' direct grain subsidies; For example, the recipient of direct grain subsidy owes the bank loans overdue not to pay it back, and repeated collection failed; Due to judicial needs, the cherry blossom account related to the grain direct subsidy object was frozen; Without the above situation, banks have no right to interfere with the freedom of personal funds.

Legal basis: Article 242nd of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), if the person subjected to execution fails to perform the obligations specified in the legal documents according to the notice of execution, the people's court has the right to inquire about the deposits, bonds, stocks, fund shares and other properties of the person subjected to execution. The people's court has the right to seal up, freeze, transfer or change the property of the person subjected to execution according to different circumstances. The property inquired, sealed up, frozen, transferred or changed in price by the people's court shall not exceed the scope of obligations that the person subjected to execution shall perform. When the people's court decides to seal up, freeze, transfer or change the price of property, it shall make a ruling and issue a notice of assistance in execution, which the relevant units must handle.